Post by mullemeckmaster on Sept 28, 2020 11:25:40 GMT
Hi
In the recent review of the Sennheiser HD560s I noticed that a new "percieved" frequency response compensation was added.
This addition was claimed to be the result of the pinna interaction which is something that has been touched before in other reviews (for example in the AKG K712 review it was explained that the dip at 3.5kHz wasn't "really" there which corresponds well with rtings findings of the k712 pro:s "passive soundstage").
I am very familiar with the test setup used here and how it doesn't in it's current version have a pinna model (I studied the documents when I built my own testing rig
).
In the HD560s review however was this compensation not really explained more than: Angled driver=This compensation.
The quote; "I found that area to be about 6dB above neutral" might give some insight but how was this 6dB "found"?
In the recent review of the Sennheiser HD560s I noticed that a new "percieved" frequency response compensation was added.
This addition was claimed to be the result of the pinna interaction which is something that has been touched before in other reviews (for example in the AKG K712 review it was explained that the dip at 3.5kHz wasn't "really" there which corresponds well with rtings findings of the k712 pro:s "passive soundstage").
I am very familiar with the test setup used here and how it doesn't in it's current version have a pinna model (I studied the documents when I built my own testing rig
).In the HD560s review however was this compensation not really explained more than: Angled driver=This compensation.
The quote; "I found that area to be about 6dB above neutral" might give some insight but how was this 6dB "found"?
