oldson
extremely active
Posts: 1,678
|
Post by oldson on May 12, 2016 20:31:13 GMT
mojo sold today. got my money back, so all is good.  |
|
|
|
Post by techboy on May 13, 2016 12:45:48 GMT
Why did you sell it? Wasn't good enough?
|
|
oldson
extremely active
Posts: 1,678
|
Post by oldson on May 13, 2016 15:42:57 GMT
only bought it to fill the gap while my micro idsd was away being repaired.
got the micro back and decided there was nothing to choose between them sound quality wise, so sold the mojo on.
|
|
|
|
Post by techboy on May 13, 2016 15:57:57 GMT
Do they sound identical?
|
|
Rabbit
Administrator
Posts: 7,091
|
Post by Rabbit on May 13, 2016 16:16:35 GMT
.......... decided there was nothing to choose between them sound quality wise, so sold the mojo on. I find dac's much the same as well, Simon if I'm honest. I tried some demo units lined up in a hifi shop once, and really couldn't tell one from the other, although there have been reports of 'night and day differences' etc!!! Not for me. More important for me is their connectivity, which is why I like the Ifi so much, plus the sheer power of the amp section. Oooh ..... Plus the bit rate that they will accept at top whack I suppose. |
|
|
|
Post by techboy on May 13, 2016 16:54:52 GMT
But both IFi and mojo aren't just DACs. They are AMP + DAC. Do both units sound absolutely identical regardless?
|
|
oldson
extremely active
Posts: 1,678
|
Post by oldson on May 13, 2016 18:40:00 GMT
But both IFi and mojo aren't just DACs. They are AMP + DAC. Do both units sound absolutely identical regardless? only used them as dacs, mate. i prefer my Ember or V200 amps. |
|
|
|
Post by techboy on May 13, 2016 18:46:26 GMT
How does Ember compare to V200?
|
|
solderdude
Administrator
measureutternutter
Posts: 4,886
|
Post by solderdude on May 14, 2016 7:51:44 GMT
I am going to pretend NOT to have seen that 'how does this and that compare' question.
|
|
Rabbit
Administrator
Posts: 7,091
|
Post by Rabbit on May 14, 2016 7:57:22 GMT
 Might be best .......... 
|
|
jello
extremely active
Posts: 1,569
|
Post by jello on May 14, 2016 11:23:14 GMT
The fission powered Ember is 3.14159x better than the coal fired V200, which is so 19th century.
|
|
solderdude
Administrator
measureutternutter
Posts: 4,886
|
Post by solderdude on May 14, 2016 14:36:24 GMT
|
|
Rabbit
Administrator
Posts: 7,091
|
Post by Rabbit on May 14, 2016 14:42:45 GMT
Let me think about that ......  Ember or V2? |
|
solderdude
Administrator
measureutternutter
Posts: 4,886
|
Post by solderdude on May 14, 2016 14:44:29 GMT
|
|
oldson
extremely active
Posts: 1,678
|
Post by oldson on May 14, 2016 15:06:28 GMT
The fission powered Ember is 3.14159x better than the coal fired V200, which is so 19th century. that depends on the tube used....... or have you based this on an average for all the tubes that are available for Ember? if so its gonna rise to 3.14165 when we get the new psu. on a serious note, i like both and use both daily. Ember is the only one that can be used as a pre-amp to my speaker amp, so if i could keep just one it would be Ember. it looks nicer too. |
|
