Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2015 13:57:06 GMT
I rotated it slightly (so the piano keys line up horizontally) and enhanced the colour and lowered the brightness a bit. Yeah, I noticed. I'm working on something better for the banner but it'll need different lights and they're not here right now. Watch this space...
|
|
Rabbit
Administrator
Posts: 7,091
|
Post by Rabbit on Feb 7, 2015 14:07:31 GMT
Actually, it's a kind of combo what with me and the synths and you and the amps!!! Better get a chip on for Javier.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2015 14:16:30 GMT
I think you'll find Javier calls them patatas fritas
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2015 16:00:51 GMT
I'm sorry to talk about knobs again. The Project Ember that I have sitting here has the stock knob. I switched it for a nice aluminium one I had lying around and it now looks much better to my eyes. However, there's still a problem with the pot itself. No matter what knob I use it just doesn't seem to stay secure. I'm wondering if this is maybe because this particular amp has seen a lot of action and so has loosened over time. Can anyone else who owns one comment on how securely their knob stays attached?
In other news...
A couple of weeks back I posted that I was getting interference from my DAC and most here seemed to doubt that. Well, you were all correct. It wasn't the DAC at all. About one week before I took delivery of the Ember I had decided to dig out my old CD player from the cupboard of doom. It's a Marantz that I've had since around 2002. Back then it sounded awesome but it was the party powerhouse in my house. It got a lot of abuse. I actually thought I'd killed it off because when I got up one morning it was soaked. I don't want to speculate as to what the wet stuff was but that was why it all went in the cupboard. Anyway, 13 years and three (yes, three) houses on I thought I'd see if it still worked. It does. At least, it plays music. However as soon as I put the Project Ember back on top of it the background noise is there. It's not subtle either. Something is obviously wrong with the internals and to be honest I never play CD's these days anyway so, long story short, it's now in the bin. Problem solved.
|
|
|
Post by musicman on Feb 8, 2015 2:30:40 GMT
Gordon, you have to get an adapter and try a 6sn7.. Attachments:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2015 5:23:57 GMT
Gordon, you have to get an adapter and try a 6sn7.. Wow, that's huge! Does it glow a lot? I guess I should also ask whether it sounds like it looks too?
|
|
|
Post by ronzo56 on Feb 8, 2015 13:32:14 GMT
Gordon, you have to get an adapter and try a 6sn7.. I second that opinion. The 6SN7's sound great IMHO, with the Ember. Great tube sound.
|
|
|
Post by musicman on Feb 8, 2015 15:47:38 GMT
I have tried many different tubes with the Ember, about 25 or 30 and I think that the 6sn7 is by far the best I have tried so far. The sound stage is huge, it is almost 3d like, not as directional, and the first tube, I tried was used,made in the 1940's, paid $6 including shipping, from Ebay, just to have something to try and it sounded great. Bought another tube, a VT231 from about 1948, and paid about $20, and has much more life left in it. The specs were better, and it is just that much better sounding. In my opinion, it was well worth the investment in the adapter, which by the way, is an excellent product, workmanship and materials you won't find on the net some where else. The tubes are relatively inexpensive and widely available as they were used in TVs for years. At sometime, I will go back to the 12at7's to compare, but for the immediate future, I am sticking with the 6Sn7's. As far as the glow is concerned, the older tube has less glow than the one from the late 40's I would think that the age has something to do with it as well. This link is not where I purchased the tubes, I have included it as a description for the different types. Informative......http://www.audiotubes.com/6sn7.htm.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2015 23:54:03 GMT
That's the Ember packed up and the O2 back in place. I could cry
|
|
|
Post by musicman on Feb 9, 2015 1:56:10 GMT
Sorry Gordon, hopefully you will be able to afford one before long. All the best, Don
|
|
|
Post by ronzo56 on Feb 9, 2015 6:46:15 GMT
Put in a re-issue Tung-Sol 6SN7 I borrowed from my tube amp. Listening to White Album. It feels the way i hear it on my speaker system. And it sounds great.
|
|
oldson
extremely active
Posts: 1,678
|
Post by oldson on Feb 9, 2015 9:05:10 GMT
Gordon, you have to get an adapter and try a 6sn7.. do you need a supercharger mod for these tubes too?
|
|
oldson
extremely active
Posts: 1,678
|
Post by oldson on Feb 9, 2015 9:13:26 GMT
is the trial Ember that Gordon has a supercharged unit?
|
|
solderdude
Administrator
measureutternutter
Posts: 4,886
|
Post by solderdude on Feb 9, 2015 10:20:05 GMT
No ( I think its about the max the 'normal' heater supply can deliver though) ... and No.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2015 11:06:12 GMT
The difference in delivery between the Project Ember & the O2 is stark. I had initially harboured some faint hope that the Ember might not be quite as good as my head was telling me and that the O2 would bring something to the party. Sadly not. The O2 just sounds thin & quite strained at the top end. Curiously the O2 is almost unlistenable with my flatish PEQ adjustments and actually benefits from the mid-bass bloom of the HD 650. I guess that's why it is generally regarded as a 'forgiving' headphone. I'm not going to bother with my Q701's, lol. Having the Project Ember has been an eye-opening experience for me. I really was content with the sound of the O2 prior to this experiment. The addition of a valve did not bring the kind of changes I might have expected either. I thought that if anything changed it might be the addition of yet more warmth to the sound but that wasn't really the case. The Ember's biggest feature for me was the soundstage. Everything got bigger and yet at the same time less congested. The bass has much more weight to it and is able to breathe. It became much easier to distinguish bass guitar from bass drum, for instance. One criticism of the 650 - certainly when driven by the O2 - might be that the vocals, whilst clearly imaged, are just a bit too up-front and central. They sound kinda locked-in. Not so with the Ember. Vocals are still clear and present but there's also a sense of air around them too. Much better. The treble improves also and in a way I hadn't expected. There's more air and yet it's not any edgier. For optimum performance when paired with the Sennheiser HD 650... Input Gain ------------------- Low (the higher gain setting only serves to reduce the amount of useable travel on the volume control; there's plenty of power on the Low setting) Input Capacitors ------------- Bypassed (sure, the volume pot becomes 'scratchy' when adjusted but that is a very small price to pay for the ambience this tweak brings to the show) Output Resistance ------------ Low (higher settings only serve to thicken the sound and bass becomes slower) All testing was undertaken using the stock valve. In short, my time with the Project Ember has been a thoroughly enlightening experience. I genuinely thought my O2 was maybe, say, 90% on the way to perfection. The Ember clearly bettered the O2 in every single department. Better, stronger, wider bass. Mids that are even more natural and breathy. Treble that adds sparkle yet avoids edginess. It's also better built and better looking. The Ember is actually not that much more expensive than the O2 but it performs in a different league altogether. I have to say a word or two about the whole Garage1217 experience. As a company I don't think I've ever seen one be so responsive to feedback. There's not a trace of arrogance to them. Everything is done for a reason and those reasons are debated & explained in a thoroughly good natured way. The community at DIYAH is beautiful too. There's a genuine sense of enthusiasm there which is quite contagious and, unlike many other headphone-oriented communities, no-one has lost sight of what this is all actually about. The music. My heartfelt thanks go to Frans, Jeremy, Javier, Ian & all the wonderful, helpful people I've met at DIYAH. I will be an owner soon Gordon.
|
|